Back in 2006, scientists at the International Astronomical Union voted to demote Pluto from a planet to a dwarf planet. Three days ago, scientists at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics had their own, unofficial, vote and decided that Pluto should again be considered a planet. You can view the entire debate on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/ObsNights under the "What is a Planet?" video.
I was on board with the redefining of planetary bodies back in 2006. I tend to embrace change when it happens in science after a tragic mistake as a teacher telling my students that bacteria did not have cytoskeletons in 2008. I had not been up to date with scientific knowledge. Turns out that after graduating from USF back in 2005, scientists had in fact discovered bacterial cytoskeletons. I had to return to my class and own up to my mistake, of course with a full lesson cytoskeletons and their functions in all cell types.
However, after watching the video from the CfA, I'm leaning back for Pluto's return to planetary status. It will mean a huge increase in the number of planets in our solar system, including the eccentric oddballs. But I read stories constantly of exo-planets with eccentric orbits. I'm back on the Pluto is a planet side of the debate. Where are you?
Pluto photo above courtesy of http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/30/Pluto.jpg/743px-Pluto.jpg